Friday, May 10, 2013
Monday, November 05, 2012
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Obama’s Coming Out Party
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Occupy Wall Street Protestors: Mindless, Anarchist-Marxist Trash
Marxists as in they believe they have a right take wealth from the productive people in society (Also called “the wealthy”) and give it to society’s less-productive and even non-productive people.
(Note: I wonder if these clowns would try to go two days without any item made by a Wall Street corporation, iPhone, laptop, bicycle, etc.)
Anarchist, as they have no respect for the property of others and no respect for the laws of the places they’re occupying
The protests have gone on for nearly a month with little or no interference by local authorities. Any thinking person (Which rules out most liberals) can now see the protestors are nothing more than a stinking (literally) bunch of mindless, Anarchist Savages.
Protestors have engaged in public nudity, (and it’s never the cute women who go nude) vandalism, illegal drug dealing and drug use, defecating on police vehicles, defecating on American Flags, assaulting police officers, stealing from other protestors, sexually assaulting females and AT LEAST one male. (One can’t say they’re not equal opportunity thugs) Even several protestors admit some of the areas where the protestors are camping are unsafe for women (and men).
In Oakland, there has even been one murder at one of the Occupy Oakland camps.
Taking a cue from Anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists, some of the speakers at the protests have engaged in anti-Jewish rants, screeching on about the evil Jewish bankers. I’m surprised Calypso Louie Farrakhan hasn’t been invited to speak at any of the events. Actually, for all I know, maybe he has.
One would expect local authorities would have worked up a Number 6 on these Anarchist hoodlums several days after they became unruly. (Not familiar with a Number 6? That’s when the police wade into the mobs, ‘a whoopin’ and a whompin’ every Anarchist thug who resists orders to disperse within an inch of their lives.)
Unfortunately, the vast majority of local governments, until recently have given the animals free reign. Really, where is the Ohio National Guard when we really need them?
Now FINALLY, some local governments are starting to crack down on the savages. However, it may be a long time before they’re cleaned out for good. When you give concessions to hoodlums, the hoodlums begin to see a “temporary” concession as a “right”
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Cafe Press Courts Queers.
This current week, according to Café Press, is queer “pride” week and is shipping pro-homo-related shirts and stickers without a shipping charge. I’m not sure if queer “pride” week is official or not. I generally don’t follow such things. Anyone with knowledge of anatomy knows homosexuality is unnatural, deviant and nothing to be “proud” of.
I ordered a few stickers promoting traditional marriage and a Straight Pride t-shirt from Café Press. Surprisingly, shipping charges were applied.
I think from now on, I’ll try harder to only buy my Right Wing “stuff” from Right Wing businesses.
Monday, May 30, 2011
The Leftist, "Peace" Activists Want Israel Dead, Dead DEAD!
Gabe Kish in her recent letter claimed that for a “just peace” with the “Palestinians” Israel should retreat to its pre-1967 borders.
Perhaps Kish just isn’t knowledgeable of the events prior to 1967. Israel would still be at its pre-1967 borders if the surrounding Arab countries hadn’t attacked them with the sole purpose of destroying the small country. An Egyptian radio broadcast on 18 May 1967 proclaimed,
"The sole method we shall apply against Israel is a total war which will result in the extermination of Zionist existence."
As we all know, Israel soundly defeated the attacking Arab countries and now holds territory they can more easily defend. Most of their Arab neighbors have never wavered from that goal, attacking Israel again in 1973 and waging a campaign of terror against the civilian population of Israel that still continues to this day.
I have one question to the people who claim Israel can have a “just peace” with their neighbors by retreating to their pre-1967 border. If “peace” wasn’t maintained when Israel was at their indefensible, pre-1967 borders, why would the peace be maintained by Israel retreating from their present border, which is more defensible?
Tuesday, April 05, 2011
An Introduction to Unionist Thugs
I was hired onto a private security company. One of the places I provided security for was USS Posco in Pittsburg California. USS Posco was a Korean/US steel production company. In 1987 they were being picketed by some union. I don’t remember the name of the union.
I at first thought the picketers had worked there and had been fired, but no. The union clowns were upset because the company, a PRIVATE company had the nerve to hire non-union workers.
My company had me stationed in sort of a demilitarized zone, a vacant lot, just outside the plant’s fence line. The picketers, usually about a dozen or so positioned themselves along the roadway leading up to the entrance of the plant. For the first few weeks I was there, they just held signs along the roadway, calling on people to oppose the company. One old geezer, “Cowboy” would sometimes say he fought “those people” during the Korean War and now they’re over here “taking our jobs”.
Of course, most of the people working at USS Posco were Americans and if “Cowboy” was fighting the Koreans at Posco, that would have meant he was fighting for Communist North Korea, which given the political bent of most unions could have been a possibility.
By the way, did I mention I was working as unarmed security and was using my personal vehicle as my guard shack? I would alternate between sitting in my car or standing near the fence line or sitting in the chair that had been set out for me. My job was to “observe and report” any actions of the picketers that threatened the property of the company or its workers.
After a week or so, after Posco continued to defy the union, the union began to get more belligerent and would shout and scream at the workers as they came and left work. At about that time, I had an epiphany. Being unarmed among these people probably wasn’t the wisest thing to do, so I started bringing my 9MM Sig-Sauer 226. It held 15 rounds in the magazine and I kept an extra two magazines in the case with the gun. The gun stayed in my vehicle as it would have been difficult to conceal in my uniform. Had the situation warranted, I would have found a way to conceal it.
Generally, they left me alone and occasionally some of them would engage in small talk. There were two colored men among the group. I remember noticing they seemed to stay more with themselves, rather than mingling with the other group. I think I remember sometimes engaging me in conversations on the evils of the White Man.
On one occasion, I observed several members of the group walk to the trunks of their cars and retrieve baseball bats, which I reported to my supervisor. Police were called but before they arrived, the unionists began “playing baseball”. The fuzz told them to put the bats away and they complied. The bats were an obvious attempt to intimidate the plant workers.
Several times there were larger groups of picketers on days when they wanted to put on a show. During one of these large demonstrations, a lawyer for Posco was there and took photographs of the picketers. At one point, he ventured into their group and they roughed him up and stole his camera. I believe he eventually did get it back… with the film removed.
Even then, I wasn’t too concerned for my safety. Remember the Sig-Sauer 226? While I only had 45 rounds, that would still be about one round per 2-3 unionist extremists. If they had chosen to assault me, I’m sure less than half a magazine would have discouraged them.
One day, I was standing near the fence line of the plant and I heard a tinkling sound coming from the direction of the unionists. I looked down the street and saw the older of the two colored guys kicking something in the roadway. I walked down the road and observed he had put several nails in the road. The nails were bent and formed so that they would puncture tires of plant workers arriving to work.
I stopped one vehicle that was approaching them and took the nails from the road. As I was retrieving the nails “Cowboy” shouted to me that I couldn’t leave the plant property. (Which of course, was b.s.) I reported the incident. After that, both of the colored guys started haranguing me about working for the White Man and accused me of being a White Man in a Black Man’s body. It was like listening to Calypso Louie Farrakhan or Malik Shabazz. They went on about how the security company wouldn’t protect me when there were “hundreds” of picketers and the unionists would be like the Molly McGuire’s. (?)
Point of fact, during the time I worked there I never saw much more than a hundred unionists. After that day, I never saw the older Colored guy again.
I believe that whole incident was a test to see what I would do. The old, colored fool could have easily placed the nails in the road quietly and I never would have noticed it.
Some time later, I was sitting in a chair near the fence line and probably had dozed off. (Pittsburg in the summer was about 80-100 degrees and there was no shade where I was) As a truck was leaving the plant, one of the picketers tossed a paper bag with some type of sharp object under the tires and it blew out one of them.
The driver described one of the old geezers who was a regular picketer. After his act of vandalism, the geezer was never there again.
On several occasion, the unionists tried to get sympathy for their cause by attempting to portray themselves as victims.
One day, as I was pacing along the fence line, when my back was turned I heard a thump behind me near the unionist’s vehicles. “Cowboy” came over to me and pointed out that one of the unionists’ vehicles was struck by a ball bearing, which shattered a window. Cowboy said the ball bearing came “right past my head”, barely missing me before hitting the car.
I call “B.S.!” on that one.
One: I was standing near a chain link fence which was about 2-3 feet taller than me.
Two: the nearest plant worker was probably about 100+ yards away. In other words, a worker, presumably using a slingshot would have had to have been accurate enough to hit a vehicle window at a hundred yards and lucky enough to miss the links in the fence.
On another day, a truck driver was approaching the plant and a unionist thug (who I’ll call Alan Henderson, A.H. for short) stood by the side of the road shouting “SCAB, SCAB, SCAB!” at him. The driver jerked the truck toward the A.H. and then back toward the road. The A.H. ran over to me and asked if I saw what just happened. I told him I did and he went back to the other unionists.
Several minutes later, an ambulance can screaming up to the unionists and A.H., who had just several minutes earlier ran up to me, was now lying on his back and claiming the truck had hit him. When the police arrived, he told them I could tell them what happened, if “I” would tell the truth. Ironic.
Obviously I couldn’t actually see if the truck hit him or not from where I was standing, but usually when a Mack truck hits someone, they aren’t able to walk all that well.
I did get a laugh one day when “Cowboy” was telling a CHP officer how some talk show host was going to give the CHP what for, for how they were treating the unionists (i.e., preventing them from damaging property, harassing plant workers).
Cowboy told the officer, He (I don’t recall the host’s name) took on Governor Deukmejian, now he was going to take on the CHP. The officer asked him, “Is Deukmejian still Governor?” Cowboy: “Yeah”. CHP Officer, “and we’ll still be the CHP”. That shut up Cowboy for a while.
I never did find out the final outcome of the USS Posco-Unionist Thug dispute. I ended up getting a better job.
That incident turned me against unions and I now only see them as a sometimes necessary evil, and that their power needs to be diminished.
The recent antics of the unionist thugs in Wisconsin and the antics of SEIU only confirm my opinion.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
The Time to Panic is NOW!!!
Last weekend, I attended a meeting of Conservative activists. After discussing several local issues our group wanted to be involved in, the topic turned to preparing a three-day survival pack in the case of a natural or man-made disaster.
The man who was asked to write a blog on survival preparations for the group website told us that a three-day pack wasn’t enough. He told us that a three-day pack wouldn’t have been enough for the people during the Katrina, adding that if an emergency lasted more than three days he would go after the person who wrote the article about preparing a pack for only three days.
Personally, if a disaster lasted more than three days, going after a person who wrote a blog posting would be the last thing on my to do list. His initial comments alone led me to believe his magazines weren’t topped off. But he went on, making him seem (if possible) even goofier.
He claimed there were foreign troops, on US soil, (which he had claimed to have seen) brought here for the sole purpose enforcing martial law. He also claimed there were Soviet tanks in America with UN markings and added that because of some executive order, the US Constitution had been abolished.
That would be news to the many court cases dealing with appeals to various laws based on their being against the US Constitution.
His rants reminded me of some of the tales I heard back in the dark ages of the Clinton era (which now seem bright compared to the B.O. administration) when there were many a panicked tale of Soviet tanks on railway flatbeds, (uncovered for the whole world to see) bus stations transformed into containment areas, equipped with guillotines for beheading patriots, foreign troops in place for disarming Americans, black helicopters here, there and everywhere doing dark, evil things like…flying, etc, etc. Many of these tales were reported in The Spotlight magazine, an anti-Jewish conspiracy theory rag whose articles made the rants of Alex Jones appear sane.
Now, I believe in some conspiracies and I know there are people in government and left-wing activist who would LOVE to have martial law declared so they can have their way with the American people and especially Conservative Christians, but for them to actually try that would wake up even some of the more inattentive people in This Country and there would be a backlash. And, by the way there have ALWAYS been foreign troops in This Country. We have foreign allies whose soldiers come here for training they can’t receive in their home countries and yes there are some Soviet-era tanks on our soil. They are also used for training. Ever heard of Ft Irwin? I don’t know if it is still open but when it was, it was a base where soldiers were trained to fight against soldiers using soviet equipment.
Also, I’m all for being prepared for emergencies and disasters. During the Y2K scare, I tried to store up supplies in case The Country descended into a Mad Max/Red Dawn situation. However, as the date came closer I started to relax a bit. (Not that I was stressing out over it to begin with) I started to figure that at worst, there would be a few, minor problems and the main thing I would have to deal with would be my VCR and microwave oven clock flashing “0000”, which didn’t happen either.
Perhaps a three-day pack isn’t enough. Had I the funds, I would prefer to have enough supplies for a month or so. I’ve heard that the “three-day” preparation rule is because it is assumed that FEMA will take three days to arrive and render aid. That being the case, a month of preparations sounds much better than three days.
Preparation is a good thing. Spreading panicky stories is not.
Sane people will disregard anything else you say.
P.S., Anyone interested in 15 cases of MREs and a crate of toilet paper? Also, stay tuned for my book on how to form a militia, shoot down black helicopters and fight against the New World Order.
Sunday, December 19, 2010
You Can Always trust A RINO
Once again, the RINO (Republican In Name Only) pukes, and one goofball Republican have sold out traditional Republican…., no COMMON SENSE, MORAL values. The usual crop of RINOs along with nut-job Ron Paul, voted to allow faggots to serve openly in the U.S. military.
My math could be off, but DADT would probably been repealed without the votes of the RINOs. However, it’s expected that Democrats will always vote the wrong way on a moral issue. Democrats lost their moral compass decades ago. Republicans are supposed to be better than that
I have several good Conservative friends who tell me, it’s better to support a RINO who can win an election, rather than sit it out and let a Liberal win. They feel that at least with a RINO, they can be worked with and if brow beaten enough they can sometimes be influenced to vote correctly on an issue.
This proves RINOs are every bit as big of an enemy, if not a greater enemy that the Democrats. If the GOP doesn’t punish these worthless pukes, I may be switching from Republican to independent.
RINOs supporting the repeal of DADT
Representative Judy Biggert (R-IL) Representative David Dreier (R-CA)
Representative Mary Bono Mack (R-CA) Representative Vernon Ehlers (R-I)
Representative John Campbell (R-CA) Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
Representative Anh 'Joseph' Cao (R-LA) Representative Ron Paul (R-TX)
Representative Mike Castle (R-DE) Representative Todd Platts (R-PA)
Representative Charlie Dent (R-PA) Representative Dave Reichert (R-A)
Representative Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL) Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)
Representative Charles Djou (R-HI)
Senator Richard Burrr (R-NC)
Senator Scott Brown (R-MA)
Senator Susan Collins (R-ME)
Senator John Ensign (R-NV)
Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL)
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)
Senator George Voinovich (R-OH)
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Where Have All the Liberals Gone?
You may have noticed that for the past 10-20 years, few people have been willing admit to being liberals. Usually, when someone is asked if they’re a Conservative or a Liberal they’ll usually either claim they’re a “moderate” meaning they’re only wrong half the time, or they’ll say there neither Conservative, nor Liberal, meaning they’re either too stupid or their moral compass too corrupt to have a consistent opinion.
Generally, whenever I hear anyone claim either of the two, the next thing out of their mouths is a recitation of the usual stream of liberal nonsensical, degenerate, race-baiting talking points. Frankly, I don’t recall EVER hearing someone claim they were a “moderate” and that wasn’t the case.
Another comment I’ll hear from liberals, pardon me, “moderates” is that “it takes two wings to fly”, which if we were talking about an actual bird that way too often used quote would make sense. But, since we’re talking about the direction This Country should be headed, it’s just more mindless gibberish.
Now there is a slight difference between Democrats and Liberals. There are some Democrats who aren’t total moral degenerates, with an illogical hatred of successful people. That is rarely the case with an actual liberal. Be VERY aware of a person who actually admits to being a Liberal. They’re almost always a hard corps Communist or Marxist in every way except for having a membership card in their wallet.
Now I do have some good friends who are Democrats and even a few who are liberals. None of the liberals I consider friends are of the activist variety. I can usually talk with them in a civil manner as long as I try to forget about the damage they’ve done and are yet doing to This Country.
While Liberals trying to fool people into believing they’re not Liberals by calling themselves “moderates” or sometimes even “Progressives” (Which is nothing more than an admission they’re Communists) is nothing new, there is a new angle I just heard about today (14 December 2010).
I was listening to Rush Limbaugh and he was speaking of a movement called “No Labels”. In summary, No Labels is an assortment of Liberal and/or Marxist goofballs who claim they are neither Left nor Right but are “Americans, concerned for “their” Country”. In actuality, “No Labels” is a sordid assortment of Liberal Democrats, Liberal Republicans (i.e. RINOs) Liberal “independents” etc., who are trying a liberal version of the Vulcan mind-meld thing to fool people into believing they’re anything but liberals.
In other words, don’t be fooled. In spite of the wins gain by Republicans (Some of whom are merely RINOs) and some Tea Party favorites, there are plenty of liberals whose Prime Directive is to transform the United Stated into another Cuba or Venezuela.
Always remember, whenever you hear some Liberal puke talking about “bi-partisanship”, or being “civil” and/or “centrist”, what they really mean is getting RINOs and other limp-wristed Republicans willing to sell out Conservative principle into helping them in achieving their Prime Directive.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
The JFK Assassination: The Conspiracy to Promote Conspiracy Theories
I feely admit I’m a reformed conspiracy believer. For over twenty years I was about 90% sure there was a conspiracy involved in JFK’s abrupt removal from office.
I’ve read a dozen or so books on the subject. Some seemed more probable than others. If all of the theories promoted in the books were true, the Grassy Knoll and the Texas School Book Repository would have been one crowded place that November 22nd morning.
I never did fully buy into the Martin Luther King or RFK conspiracy theories. Last night on Noory’s show, he said the King family believes James Earl Ray was innocent. Whether they actually believe that or not, I’m sure they feel King’s martyr status is more enhanced if he was the victim of a grand government conspiracy rather than just a victim of a racist, somewhat stupid ex-con.
The main reason I believed in the JFK conspiracy was because of the “magic bullet” theory. The books promoting the conspiracy all claimed Oswald wasn’t a good shot. In Oliver Stone’s movie JFK, Congressman Hale Boggs tells New Orleans Prosecutor Jim Garrison that Oswald got “Maggie’s Drawers” meaning he wasn’t any good.
I was always suspicious of that claim. Oswald was a US Marine. While obviously not every Marine is a Carlos Hatchcock, one generally doesn’t need to be at 88 yards. Practically ANYONE can hit a human-sized target at 88 yards with a scoped rifle. ANY Marine who made it through Boot Camp could have made that shot. Granted, being as the target was sitting in a moving vehicle made it more difficult. I would imagine since the vehicle was moving away from Oswald at a slight angle, rather than moving across his field of vision from left to right, the shot still wouldn’t that difficult.
An A&E or History Channel special about the assassination thoroughly debunked the myth of Oswald not “being any good” as a marksman. An investigator for the show produced a range scorecard for Oswald showing that at the distance the shot at JFK was taken, Oswald’s marksmanship was more than adequate for the task.
The only difficult thing dealing with Oswald’s marksmanship was the number of shots. The Warren report concluded there were three shots with one shot being a complete miss. The missed shot was apparently the first shot he took. True Believer’s have a field day with that. Most conspiracy theorists claim the first shot is always the most accurate.
That isn’t always case. I’ve spent some time behind a scoped rifle, granted, not a Mannlicher-Carcano, but a scoped rifle all the same. Especially with a moving target, the first shot isn’t always going to be the most accurate. I’ve done a little bit of hunting and sometimes my first shot at the target misses with my second shot connecting if the target is till present.
Also remember, Oswald wasn’t The Jackal nor was he a professional hitter at all. He would have been nervous and I’m betting he was sure he had been seen as soon as he stuck his rifle out of the window. It’s highly likely he rushed his first shot.
The True Believers repeat the legend that no one has been able to duplicate the number of accurate shots in the time (6.8 seconds) that Oswald “allegedly” made the shots. While perusing my copy of the Warren Commission Report, I read in one of the sections that several military shooters WERE able to duplicate the shots. Remember, only two of the three shots needed to be accurate to show Oswald was capable of the feat.
Granted, the tests were not conducted with an actual moving target, but three targets were placed at the distances where Oswald is believed to have scored hits. The military shooters in the experiments still would have had to fire, locate their target through the scope and fire again.
I tried firing three shots with a bolt-action rifle at a target 100 yards away as fast as I could. I’m not in any way claiming my test duplicated what Oswald did, I was only trying to get at least two accurate shots in 6.8 seconds. I was able to do it in 6.8 seconds and got three shots in a 2 inch group. I’m guessing the 6.5 round kicks less than the 7.62 round I was firing.
For me the only evidence of a conspiracy was the “Magic Bullet”. According to the Warren Report, one of Oswald’s bullets struck Kennedy in the back, came out his chest, went through Connally’s back, struck his right wrist and ended up in his thigh.
The bullet was later recovered from the stretcher Connally was transported on. Obviously this Warren Commission Report conclusion seemed highly unlikely, until you actually see how JFK and Connally were seated. Conspiracy theorists have Connally seated directly in front of JFK and at the same height. In reality however, JFK was sitting a bit higher that Connally and Connally was sitting a bit to the left of JFK. In this scenario, the bullet wound line up perfectly.
This information is not new. Any JFK conspiracy theory “researcher” could easily find this. However, it appears to me the true “conspiracy” involves the people who promote the myths about the tragic JFK assassination. Many may do it to sell a book, some are True Believers who really feel there was a conspiracy and feel anyone who can’t see that is in denial.
Others I fear, are people who truly hate This Country and want to promote the myth that This Country is pure evil and will believe and promote any half-baked tale of evil-doing by Our Government.
Obviously, This Country isn’t perfect, but Our government is too incompetent to successfully pull off most of the conspiracies Its accused of participating in.
For more on the JFK assassination Conspiracy Theory Myths see: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
For more on the “Magic Bullet” Theory see: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm
Saturday, November 06, 2010
BART Cop Sentenced for ACCIDENTALLY Shooting a Resisting Ex-Con: Mindless Masses Riot
The officer claimed, and a jury believed (along with me and anyone else with common sense) the officer thought he had drawn his taser. Only a mindless fool could actually believe Mehserle intentionally shot the ex-con with dozens of witnesses and probably about as many cell phone cameras surrounding him.
As usual, whenever a black thug is shot by a white police officer, race-baiting, black fools, community “activists” (instigators) and their enablers of other races screamed “racism” and that Mehserle intentionally murdered the ex-con.
Had Grant III followed the instructions of police officers, he wouldn’t have been shot at all, with either taser or firearm, a fact that is ignored by the masses of asses who attended the rally.
After the ruling, a rally and a march were held in downtown Oakland and also as usual, some of the attendees vandalized property and attacked police officers. One officer had his gun and holster taken from him and the mob threw bottles at officers. For some reason, the people of Oakland seem to be prone to riot over pretty much anything. Granted, this riot wasn’t as bad as the last one when the scum of Oakland rioted when Mehserle was convicted of manslaughter instead of murder.
Oddly enough, I’ve never heard of a rally to protest the numbers of blacks murdered by other blacks (Last year there were over 100 murders and 72 so far this year) that occur in Oakland yearly.
I suppose that can be expected: Oakland is the founding place of the Black Panther Party, terrorist group, the Black Nationalist group Uhuru and has had Jerry Brown and Communist sympathizer Ron Dellums as mayors.
Perhaps what Oakland really needs is for all the police in Oakland to take a month off and let the race-baiting, Left-wing community activists keep the peace in Oakland. I’m sure after the month is over many of the savages will have killed each other off and the Oakland police will have less hoodlums to deal with when they return to work.
Saturday, October 30, 2010
You Can Trust the Demoncrats, To Try and Steal an Election
In spite of the predictions of a Republican, and perhaps even a Conservative victory I’m already preparing myself for disappointment. When dealing with liberals, one thing should never be forgotten. Liberals, which includes many, if not most Demoncrats have no concept of common decency or fair play. At least not when it keeps them from promoting their Marxist-lite political agenda.
Liberals have no problem lying about their opponents, vandalizing their property and absolutely no qualms about cheating during elections. In fact, cheating during elections is something Demoncrats have mastered, with varying successes over the years. One should never forget the Chicago election where the dead voted for Lyndon Johnson.
Perhaps because denying a dead person the right to vote simply because they are no longer living is discriminatory.
There are already reports of electronic voting machines in Nevada pre-selecting Demoncrat Harry Reid, voting machines which, by the way, are maintained by SEIU union members. In several states, military absentee ballots are being delayed in getting out to the soldiers. You may recall during the 2000 election, the Demoncrats tried to keep absentee ballots mailed by military members overseas from being counted because they were delivered late to their respective precincts.
Military members are more prone to vote Republican than Demoncratic.
Illegal aliens voted in the Congressional between Loretta Sanchez (DSA Progressive Caucus) and Bob Dornham. Even after it was proven illegal aliens voted in the election, it was upheld and Dornham lost his seat.
The stage has been set for the same kind of voter fraud because poll workers in many places are not allowed to ask voters for proof of identity.
With so much to lose in this election, you can be assured the Demoncrats are GOING TO CHEAT THEIR ASSES OFF!
Michael Steele is claiming that already, Demoncrats plan to challenge their losses in court and steal elections with the help of Left-Wing, activist judges.
Still, I hoping and praying for the best.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Sodomite Soldiers and the Common Sense Solution
*****WARNING, THIS POST IS RATED PG******************
Like me, you may have noticed the vast majority of the people seeking to allow homos to openly enlist in the U.S. military are people, i.e., Hollywood celebrities, left-wing activists, etc., who would never, EVER join. Indeed, many of the people seeking to allow homos to serve, besides other homos are people who like Bill Clinton “loathe” the military and want to destroy the morale of the service members.
Under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) homos could enlist if they would keep their perverted practices to themselves. I’m assuming during my tour in the military there several homos whom I was never aware of. I only know of one, but more on him later.
Homosexuals want to serve openly because they want to feel “normal” and are butt hurt (so to speak) over any person or organization that reminds them they are anything but normal.
They refuse to accept the simple fact that the vast majority of society and especially those serving in the military are disgusted by homosexual activity and definitely don’t want to live in close proximity with them. The goal of the homosexual lobby is to force everyone in society to accept their perverted behavior.
There is one simple solution to the issue that everyone seems to be ignoring. People currently serving in the military should be able to vote on whether they want to serve alongside a homo. While I suspect most females would have few problems serving with a lesbian, I suspect the vast, vast majority of male service members would strongly oppose being roommates with a homosexual man.
If the service members vote to allow open sodomites to serve, service members who joined prior to the vote and oppose serving with a homo should be allowed an honorable discharge.
There of course would be many homos who would only join the military to make a point and would spend much of their time filing complaints of “harassment” and “discrimination”. Of course many potential recruits would refuse to join.
In my humble, however correct opinion a vote on the issue would be the only fair and balanced way to go. However, I’m afraid allowing open homosexuals to serve will be forced down the military’s throat.
Also, the various military branches would have to change their mottos to "We never leave our buddy's behind".
******WARNING, THIS SECTION OF THE POST IS RATED PG-17****
The Milton Brown incident
As I mentioned in the earlier part of this rant, I only knew of one confirmed homosexual in any of the Army units I belonged to.
This incident happened in the early 80’s in the 165th MP CO at the Fischbach Army Depot in Germany.
When I first met Milton Brown (real name changed) I got the impression he was a bit light in the combat boots when he introduced himself to me. He spoke in what could best be described as a homosexual “accent”.
I thought to myself, “Is he…., nah, he couldn’t be, he’s way too obvious. Fortunately Milton wasn’t in my platoon and I very rarely had to be in his presence.
Several months later I heard of an incident in the barracks involving Milton and another soldier in his platoon.
According to barracks legend, Milton and another male were in a room watching videos and drinking beer. (Considering my suspicions about Milton, being alone in a room with him would not be something I would even REMOTELY consider doing)
The other soldier fell asleep and awoke to find Milton performing a sex act on him that Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski would recognize.
After breaking contact, the other soldier reported the incident and Milton was well on his was way to a discharge.
Prior to being discharged, Milton was involved in another, less extreme incident with another soldier.
Of course, the homo lobby will call this an isolated incident and no reason to keep homos from entering the military.
I obviously disagree. The Milton incident is one of several reasons (One of the other main reasons is the effect on troop morale) why homosexuals, in or out-of-the-closet should be kept from joining the military.
Monday, October 04, 2010
Attack of the RINOs: Fight Back!
Republican Advance wanted, among other things to soften the GOP’s anti-Communist stance. Several years later a Leftist Republican group calling itself the Ripon Society, named after the city where the Republican Party was founded, continued the attacks on traditional Republicans.
The Ripon Society, in their book “From Disaster to Distinction” called for the GOP to abandon distinctions between public vs. private, business vs. labor Conservative vs. liberal and called for “moderates” (i.e., liberal pukes) to take control of the Republican Party.
The Ripon Society in 1966 wanted the U.S. to recognize Red China, which Ripon Society member Richard Nixon eventually did.
Ronald Reagan, calling it the 11th Commandment said “Thou shalt speak no ill of thy fellow Republican”. While Reagan meant well, what this means in practice is no traditional Republican should speak the truth about a RINO.
In 1999-2000, another group of RINOs calling themselves the “Mainstream” Republicans went against traditional Republicans focusing their attacks on the Republican Central Committees. At that time I was with the Monterey County Republican Central Committee (MCRCC).
RINOs love talking about the “Big Tent” when they want Traditional Republicans to accept some RINO puke into their ranks. Once RINOs are in power the “Big Tent” becomes an exclusive club where only other RINOs are accepted or tolerated.
Calling traditional Republicans “extremists”, the “Mainstream Republicans” ran a RINO candidate against each traditional Republican running for re-election in the central committees and nearly all other offices.
I should have seen it coming. During that time I often attended the County Republican women’s groups. At one of the meetings held several months before the RINO attack, a Republican candidate was speaking to the group and one of the women asked what could be done about the Fundamentalist Christians who were ruining the Party.
The “Mainstream Republicans” seemed to think that if only the Republican sold out on a few of their traditional social positions, more Democrats would vote for them.
One of the main RINO pukes in California set on diluting the Republican Party was former Ventura County Assembly Brooks Firestone. Firestone supported special rights for queers, affirmative action (quotas), gun control and partial birth abortion.
Locally, (Monterey County) two of the main RINOs opposing traditional Republicans was Peter Newman and Paul Bruno.
Newman would often bash the Traditional Republicans on the Central Committee, calling us “single-issue” (anti-abortion) candidates.
One odd thing about the RINOs running against us, I don’t recall ever seeing ANY of them at a Central Committee meeting. At least, not before they were selected to run against us. One would think if they thought we were doing everything wrong, they would have come to a meeting or two to tell us WHAT we were doing wrong or what we should do differently.
Once the RINOs won control of the Central C, they tried to minimize the participation of the few Traditional Republicans left. One of the committee members told me the RINOs were prone to hold closed meetings with each other and excluding him and other traditional Republicans.
Each Central Committee member selects an alternate who can vote in their place in their absence. Prior to the RINO take over, any alternate chosen by the member was accepted as long as they were a registered Republican. The RINOs however, wanted to make sure the alternate was, if not another RINO was at least someone who wasn’t too outspoken against RINOs.
One of the traditional Republicans chose me to be his alternate. Now, by this time, I had written several letters to local papers about the “Mainstream Republicans” to include one about Brooks Firestone and how he was no “Republican”.
One of the “Mainstreamers” on the Committee logged into an online newspaper message board that I frequented (The far-Left Monterey Coast Weakly) under an alias. He wrote about how much he liked a particular RINO Republican Politician n in an attempt to “catch” me in the act of calling a RINO a RINO. My online handle was well-known at the time to some people on the Central Committee.
I of course, did what was expected (and would do it again) and called the RINO puke RINO puke, though probably not in those exact words (I should have used those exact words).
The “Mainstreamers” used that to vote against me being the traditional Republican’s alternate, so much for the “Big Tent”.
Mid-way into RINO-lite W. Bush’s term, after he and Congress and Senate RINOs spent money like a drunken socialists, the Republicans lost their majority,.
Word to Bush and all other “Republicans”, when you find supporting the same bill as the drunken, womanizing (Red) Ted Kennedy, you can be sure you’re on the wrong side.
One would have thought that with the rise of the Tea Party and their opposition to B.O.’s even greater spending, the RINOs would have learned their lesson. But that would have been asking too much.
With Tea Party candidates winning some of the Republican primaries, one would have thought the “Big Tent” RINOs would have welcomed them with open arms and the losing RINO candidates would have endorsed the winners.
Instead; in Alaska RINO Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who lost to Traditional Republican Joe Miller is staying in the race and running as a write-in candidate, which of course will split the Republican vote.
After Sharon Angle, who was supported by the Tea Party won in the primary race against Sue Lowden, NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who’s too much of a liberal puke to even be considered a RINO is hosting a fund raiser with Democrats to support Angle’s Democrat opponent, Harry Reid.
Shortly before Christine O’Donnell won the Delaware Republican primary against RINO Mike Castle, he said it would be difficult for him to support O’Donnell if she won. Castle used the tired old RINO refrain used to bash Traditional Republicans, of “she is just not going to win the general election”.
Allegedly, the Delaware Republican Party chairman (according to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chairman) said O’Donnell could not be elected dogcatcher.
RINOs have been using the “He (she) can’t win” refrain since traditional Republican Robert Taft sought the presidential nomination against the favored RINO of his time, Republican and Former Democrat Dwight Eisenhower.
According to several polls, it appears the Republican Party will win a majority in the House and possibly even in the Senate.
With the Republican Party still infected by RINOs, it’s highly possible the GOP will sellout Traditional Republican values and piss away their victory just as they did during W. Bush’s term.
RINOs are a bigger threat to the Republican Party than any Democrat could ever be.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Compromising positions: Ann Coulter Climbs Into Bed with the Queer Lobby
When I first read Ann Coulter was going to be the main speaker at Homocon, an event put on by GOProud, a queer, “Conservative” activist group, I was skeptical. The person who posted the story on one of the Conservative e-mail lists I belong to is himself a practicing homo.
Frankly, I don’t see how having sex with another man is anything to be “proud” of, but then again homosexuality is a mental illness brought on by being sexually confused.
Several days later WorldNetDaily.com (WND) posted an article verifying the story. The article went on to say Joseph Farah dropped Ann as a keynote speaker for WND’s “Taking America Back National Conference. Obviously the homosexual lobby is one of the groups America should be taken back from.
No, I don’t “hate” sodomites, nor do I have a “phobia” about them. I am, however thoroughly disgusted by their perverted activity and enraged at their attempts to propagandize and coerce the general public into accepting their unnatural behavior as “normal”.
Coulter says she doesn’t always agree with everything promoted by the groups she speaks to. However, speaking for a group of queer activists gives the impression that Ann endorses them and their perverted lifestyle.
When Ann was asked why she was agreed to speak at the gala she responded because she was being paid. Doesn’t that make her somewhat of a prostitute, for her to be all to willing to sell out her principles and self-respect for money?
Perhaps Ann would be equally willing to speak at the pro-abortion Planned Parenthood or Republicans for Choice if the price were right. What if a group of “Conservative” pornographers wanted to pay her for speaking (and hopefully nothing else) at their event, would she also speak to their group.
One thing homosexuals LOVE doing (besides other men) is associating themselves with legitimate Conservative issues and Conservative groups in an attempt to gain acceptance for their degenerate behavior.
Getting a Conservative, or perhaps ex-Conservative to speak at their event is a propaganda coup for the queer lobby. The only bigger coup would be for Ann to come out of the closet and announce she planned to move to Maine and “marry” her girlfriend.
Ann Coulter is, or was one of my favorite authors and I’m highly disappointed in Ann and I’m hoping this isn’t the start of a downward, Liberal trend for her.
Never put too much faith in mortals, they will often let you down at some time or another.
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Sam Farr(Left) Town Hall
With this in mind, though the meeting started at 1800 hrs, I arrived to wait in line at 1700 hrs. I was the first one there and it was close to 1730 hrs before there were even 20 people in line. Once the meeting began, the auditorium was only about half full.
I despise Farr. He’s so far Left I suspect he has the Hammer and Sickle monogrammed on his underwear. However, I do give him credit for holding town halls. Some of his colleagues won’t because they fear they may actually face tough questions. True, Monterey County is polluted with (mostly) aging Marxists and hippies and Farr knows he’ll get his share of softball questions.
I personally suspect some of his supporters ask questions only to take time away from people who want to ask serious questions.
There was a first at this particular town hall, at the very end of the meeting, Farr actually said something I agreed with, whether he actually meant what he said remains to be seen, but more on that later.
Farr always starts off a town hall by telling the crowd what “he’s” done for his district. What “he’s” done for the district with federal government money, OUR federal government money that is. I don’t remember much of what he said then except for him telling us the federal government now forces public schools to provide fruits and vegetables during lunchtime.
I for one don’t see where it’s the government business to tell local schools what to provide during lunchtime.
Question and answer highlights:
Once the question and answer period started the first question from where else but the left side of the auditorium was from local Leftist activist Darby Worth. Worth is a member of WILPF, The Peace Coalition of Monterey County and a fan, if not worshipper of Fidel Castro.
Her question accordingly attacked private business. Worth asked Farr where he stood on the issue of corporate “personhood”. For some reason, while the Nation is faced with problems of the economy, terrorism, illegal aliens, winning, or extracting Ourselves from two foreign wars the Left in This Country is concerned that corporations are considered “persons” (?) I don’t stay awake at night concerned that a corporation is considered a “person”, whatever that means.
Worth and the other Leftist who whine about corporate “personhood” seem to think it means corporations don’t have to face punishment for wrongdoings. Tell that to BP.
Farr answered that corporations are responsible for their mistakes and wrongdoings and that he would have to look more into the issue.
One other parson whined about corporations being able to use their First Amendment rights to donate to campaigns, which of course Farr also opposes.
Farr said he wants government funding of campaigns.
One mother complained that her son’s elementary school did not have a 3rd grade class and that it was combined with the 2nd and 4th grade because of overcrowding. To me, that seems to be a local issue except that I bet if the schools were cleared of students who were the children of illegal aliens class overcrowding would clear up.
Farr went on to crow about voting on spending more federal money to bail out local public schools.
There was a light-hearted moment when a conspiracy nut asked if Obama, who he called Barry Sotoro (his real name) was planning a “false flag” terrorist event in the Gulf region, so that he could act tough and gain back some of his popularity. The person said the number of navy ships in the near Iran makes him think Obama may be up to something.
For those of you not into conspiracy theories, a “false flag” incident is where the government conducts an attack on its own people, making it look like another country or terrorist group committed the act in order to give the government a reason to attack that country or group.
Many who believe “911 was an inside job” believes this myth.
Farr, while keeping a straight face told the man “no”.
Personally, I think the man is on dope if he believes that if such a conspiracy existed, Farr would be one of the people the “conspirators” would tell.
Peter Kaiser asked Farr about the DOD appropriations bill that will allow sodomites to openly serve in the military and provide tax-payer funded abortions to knocked-up service members.
Farr told him, rape victims should be able to get abortions (the appropriations bill doesn’t limit abortions to rape victims) and that Viagra is provided to service members. I personally have trouble seeing the connection between the two. Farr added that the Adm. Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (Not too surprisingly, it's a Navy guy who supports homosexuals. I wonder if he's a rear admiral.) supports open sodomites in the military. Peter added that while Mullen supports sodomites, all of the other Joint Chiefs opposes allowing them to serve openly. (Remind me to throw away the coin I got from Mullen)
One pro-queer clown called Peter a “Bozo” and said Israel allows sodomites to serve openly in its military.
Farr and several other people told the pro-queer clown that he shouldn’t stoop to name-calling.
Tea Party activists Robin asked Farr about the SEC not being bound by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Farr said he was unaware that was included in the Finance Reform bill and asked Robin why she didn’t bring that up while the bill was being discussed to which Robin said it was not posted and that it was Farr's job to READ THE BILL before voting on it.(B.O. promised all bills would be posted online before Congress would vote on them) Robin also brought up that B.O. expanded the Patriot Act. (I refer you to one of my past posts that if B.O. won the election and Congress stayed in the hands of the Dark Side (Demoncrats) you would hear nothing else about the Patriot act.)
One Marxist called the war in Iraq and Afghanistan “genocide” and claims U.S. forces are mostly killing civilians. (I also direct you to my post about this kind of talk is probably what inspired the attack of the DLI soldiers at a local beach)
Farr said the military needs to be downsized.
A doper asks about legalizing dope. I tend to think the comments by the conspiracy theorist are a good example of why dope should remain illegal.
A Tea Party person (Sorry, I forgot your name) spoke of the danger of a one-party rule. Personally, I don’t mind a one-party rule by the Right and by the Right I mean by Conservatives and not necessarily Republicans, at least not until the RINOs can be purged from the Party.
Several people asked about illegal aliens and Farr spoke of an increase of funding for border enforcement (it’ll be fun to see how long this will last after the election) and how he helped implement jail checks for illegal aliens in Monterey/Santa Cruz County.
Now for the part where I actually agreed with something Sam Farr said.
A person who I assumed was a foreigner asked for an increase in the visas that allow highly-skilled foreigners into the Country where they can start more high-tech companies like Google.
Farr said we should be more concerned about getting more Americans highly skilled and educated and hopes to see more products with “Made in America” written on them again.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
The NAACP: Lawn Jockeys for the Left
Booker T. Washington wrote those before the creation of the NAACP and the births of race-baiting, poverty-pimps Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and similar people of their ilk, but those words seem to be even truer today.
The NAACP (or as I call them, Negroes Are Actually Colored People) have done some good in their past, but since Blacks have been given equal rights the NAACP have pretty much found themselves without a purpose, and their hierarchy risk losing their jobs and influence. So The NAACP have been reduced to exploiting cases of actual racism, shrieking “racism” where none exist and of course allowing themselves to be used as lawn jockeys for the liberal/socialist agenda.
In years long past, a lawn jockey was a clownish-looking statue of a black male, dressed as a jockey and holding a lamp. The statue usually had the male with bulging eyes, with the whites (of the eyes) highlighted and the skin painted extremely dark.
Likewise, the left promotes a caricature of blacks as needing the government to help them and that any social or political problem affects blacks and other minorities more because of white racism. i.e. “racists” are against affirmative (quotas) action, “racists” want lower taxes, (There was a black politician several years ago who told congress “The new word for n****r and s**k was tax cuts) the death penalty is “racist”; enforcing our immigration laws is “racist” etc. When the Left promotes queer “marriage” they claim it must be supported because “racists” opposed interracial marriage between people of the opposite gender.
If you take a look at the NAACP website, you’ll find them promoting the usual Leftist agendas; opposing climate change (one would think they should take that up with G-d) via a climate “justice” initiative, reducing prison populations, (and they don’t mean by freeing wrongly incarcerated people), allowing convicted felons to vote, lifting the federal ban on funding needle exchange program (Obviously, dopers have the Constitutional right to use illegal dope without the risk of getting HIV/AIDS), supporting Washington DC’s gun ban (which ensures law-abiding blacks won’t be able to defend themselves against black thugs), etc.
The NAACP is also currently involved in a lawsuit against Arizona’s law against illegal aliens, claiming the law promotes “racial profiling” which the Arizona law specifically prohibits.
Currently, the NAACP is considering condemning the “racist” elements of the Tea party movement. Should the do that, hopefully Tea Party groups would sue the NAACP for slander (or is it libel?).
One should not be surprised the NAACP has a close association with the Left-wing and their causes, W.E.B. Dubois, one of its main members during its beginnings was a Communist. The NAACP in 1922 received grants from the Communists-linked Garland Fund.
In 1938 the NAACP was represented at the Soviet-controlled World Youth Congress. During the 1940s it was affiliated with the Communist-linked World Federation of Democratic Youth. In 1946 the NAACP supported to the establishment of the Communist-dominated Progressive Party. (www.DiscoverTheNetworks.org via The Biological Dictionary of the Left, Vol. 1 (?))
Not surprisingly, the NAACP is giving admitted Communist Van Jones, who was B.O.’s “Green Jobs Czar” until his Communist leaning were reported by Glenn Beck, the NAACP President’s Award calling him a “national treasure”.
It’s high time the NAACP stopped being looked at as a “civil right” organization and instead being called what it actually is, a wing of the Democratic/Socialist party, or as I put it, lawn jockeys for the left.
Friday, July 09, 2010
Wild West Justice: The Antidote for Rioters
For those of you who live out of the area, Oakland generally has more than 100 murders each year. Most of the victims and perpetrators are black. One would think that would be more of a reason to get upset and take some kind of action (Action other than rioting that is.) rather than getting upset over the accidental shooting of an ex con.
Yes I said accidental. Many people in the SF Bay area and especially the usual collection of Far-Left, race-bating activists think (or rather feel, because I don’t think most Left-Wing activists put much “thought” into their conclusions about the verdict) the former officer should have been convicted of murder.
One over-emotional, common-sense deficient writer went as far to claim the black ex-con was “executed” by the officer.
The officer claims he thought he was holding his taser when he shot the hood. For the record, I personally think the officer, who claimed the ex-con was reaching into his pocket, knew he was holding his pistol but accidentally shot him while he was struggling with him, which of course still falls into the definition of manslaughter rather than murder.
It’s hard for me, or any other rational person to think a police officer would intentionally murder someone with dozens of people and cameras witnessing the event.
The family of the ex-con sniveled that there were no blacks on the jury. Apparently the ex-con’s family never heard that the object in selecting a jury is to get a fair trial and not to make getting a conviction easier.
If I were the former officer’s lawyer, I would do my best to make sure there were no blacks on the jury either and ESPECIALLY no blacks from Oakland or Los Angeles.
Looking at some videos of the rioting the thugs didn’t appear to be all that upset to begin with. Hoodlums were laughing and cheering as they were entering stores, stealing property and lighting fires. Generally, when I get upset, I don’t go off looting and vandalizing other people’s property, especially if they have nothing to do with why I’m upset. But then again, I guess I just don’t have that Oakland mentality.
The rioting thugs just used the opportunity to do as part of a mob what they wouldn’t do on their own.
I was somewhat amused by the Oakland police chief who said during a press conference he was “disappointed” by the actions of the rioters and that "This city is not the wild, wild west". Obviously not, in the old west (which wasn’t really all that wild in most places) shop owners and posses armed citizens would have blasted the thugs out of their boots as soon as they broke a window, or tried to steal something from their business.
Perhaps if we were to employ some of that “Wild, Wild West” justice, hoodlums wouldn’t be as prone to riot.
Sunday, June 27, 2010
“Peace” People Promote Pro-Palestinian Propaganda
The “Peace” Resource Center is associated with the “Peace” Coalition of Monterey County PCMC. I use “peace” in quotation marks because these people aren’t as much concerned about “Peace” as they are about promoting their Socialist/Marxist agenda.
You’ll find that “peace” activists throughout the years have NEVER said anything against atrocities committed by communist governments or the Communist terrorist/revolutionary groups they sponsor and they will ALWAYS take a position against This Country and Our allies.
I didn’t peruse the books in their bookcases, but one book prominently displayed was one of Noam Chomsky’s books and there was a poster of Hugo Chavez, the Marxist dictator of Venezuela.
I’ve attended at least two discussions put on by the PCMC where the speakers were singing the praises of Fidel Castro and his Communist policies, policies they want to put in place in This Country.
I’ve often attended meetings put on by this group because there was a time when I liked to hear what the enemy was saying. I don’t attend as often as I used to. One, I know where they stand on nearly every issue. Two, most of their meetings are on days when I work and three, I really, REALLY despise these “people”, sometimes to the point of barely considering them human beings and I generally can only take so much of their drivel.
Tonight’s discussion centered on Palestine-born author Susan Abulhawa who wrote a book titled “Mornings in Jenin” (original working Title: “Scar of David”)
Considering the discussion was given at the “Peace” Resource Center and that it was being led by a “Palestinian”, I was expecting the usual anti-Israel rhetoric common among their ilk. I wasn’t disappointed.
Much of the discussion was about IDF invasion of the Jenin refugee camp from 3-11 April 2002. Regurgitating the usual left-wing propaganda about the invasion, Bulhawa accuses the IDF of committing a “massacre” in Jenin, and scoffs at reports of Jenin being a hotbed of terrorism. Perhaps calling Jenin a hotbed of terrorism would not be entirely accurate. Israel’s concern was not terrorism in Jenin, it was the terrorism exported from Jenin into Israel.
From October 2000 until the invasion there were 23 suicide attacks against Israel with another five attempted attacks. The IDF captured a document written by the Fatah terrorist group that called Jenin the “martyr’s” (suicide bombers) capital.
Oddly enough, (or not) Abulhawa doesn’t mention any of this. Nor does she mention that after Hamas and other Leftist groups claimed 300-400 Palestinians were killed, only about 55 were confirmed killed, only about seven of the dead were civilians.
Laughably, Abulhawa and other Leftists at the meeting whined about the “pro-Israel bias” in the media. Abulhawa also whined about how “Palestinians” are looked on by much of the world as terrorists. Apparently, it has nothing to do with the many acts of terrorism committed by “Palestinian” Muslims.
What was perhaps the most offensive part of this discussion was how Abulhawa and some of the other Liberals attending compared the treatment of Palestinians to the mass extermination of Jews during WWII. I don’t recall any reports of “Palestinians” being systematically murdered, but perhaps that’s because to the pro-Israel “bias” of the media.
I could go on about this discussion, but if you’ve ever heard or read anti-Israel propaganda, then you’ve probably heard everything else that was said at this meeting before.
I’ve written before that I’ve attended several meetings but on by the PCMC and others of their ilk, so often some of the people there know me and they also know that I’m not one of them.
One of the attendees, an American white woman who converted to Islam (A woman voluntarily converting to Islam is about as logical as a Jew converting to Islam, or a Colored person converting to Mormonism) asked me what I thought about the discussion. I told her it was pretty much what I expected, a bunch of Liberals making excuses for terrorists.
She made several mocking comments about “those bad terrorists”. I asked her several times if she thought terrorism i.e. the 9-11 attacks (Which I do think was committed by Muslims and not Bush and Cheney) was a bad thing and she asked me if I was afraid of them.
She continued on with the usual Liberal talking points about the 9-11 attacks being committed by Saudis so why are we killing children in Iraq, claiming the drone strikes were killing woman and children, etc. I pointed out that we aren’t killing civilians on purpose and that there is a difference (To sane people) between intentionally targeting civilians and attacking terrorists and accidentally killing civilians as a result.
But I tend to not spend too much time arguing with fools because people may get the two of you confused.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
The California Primary, 8 June 2010:
Governor’s Race: Three Bad Choices
It appears that the heads of the Illuminati met at the Bohemian Grove to plot on finding three gubernatorial candidates who would be the worst for California. After selecting them, they thought to themselves, “Indeed, these three verily suck, but even with these three, one of them may make a decision by accident that would actually benefit California”.
So they decided to dig even deeper and select three even worse candidates, Former governor Jerry (Moonbeam) Brown, Meg (nit)Whitman and Steve Poizner.
One would either have to be on dope, a Marxist or have recently received a lobotomy to seriously consider voting for Brown.
Meg Whitman and Steve Poizner are the two alleged Republican challengers to the Moonbeam. I seriously doubt and court of law would find enough evidence to convict either of them for being a Republican.
If the situation in California weren’t so serious, one would find amusement in RINOs (Republican In Name Only)Poizner and Whitman accusing each other of being a RINO.
Whitman, who was at one time supported amnesty for illegal aliens, is now talking tough about securing the border, even though she opposes the Arizona law.
Whitman, who is at least in her 50’s wasn’t even registered to vote prior to 2007 and now she wants us to believe she’s so concerned about the state of California, she deserves to be governor.
Whitman in 1999 donated $1000 to John Kerry, in 2002, donated $2000 to Demoncratic NY congressman Mike Honda and $4000 in 2003 to Barbara Boxer.
Whitman also bashed Reagan’s tax cuts and while CEO of Ebay, banned the site from publishing adds for firearms and firearm accessories.
She did however support Proposition 8, California’s anti-queer “marriage” initiative and supports parental notification prior to a minor having an abortion.
But, the final nail in Whitman’s coffin on why I won’t vote for her, the Monterey Coast Weekly, the most left-wing paper in Monterey County, other than The People’s Daily World endorses Whitman as the “Republican” candidate for governor.
Tom Campbell vs. Carly Fiorina vs. Chck DeVore.
Three people, calling themselves Republicans are running against Comrade Babs Boxer for U.S. Senate. One is a true Republican, one is a questionable Republican and the other isn’t even Republican enough to be considered a RINO.
The other “Republican” I’m speaking of is of course, Tom Campbell. For those who are completely lacking in morality and common sense, if you like Babs Boxer, you’ll love Tom Campbell. In fact, why would one bother with voting for Campbell as long as Boxer is in the senate? Arguably, Dizzy Dianne is more Republican than Campbell.
My choice is DeVore. His Conservative credentials are solid and proven, unlike Fiorina who has never held a public office. Fiorina supported the Wall Street bailout, left-wing, pro-La Raza Judge Sotomayer as a Supreme Court Justice, and opposes Arizona’s anti-illegal alien Law, and lastly she’s supported by faux Conservative Sarah Palin.
I can forgive Palin for running as a Conservative “beard” for notorious RINO John McCain and even supporting McCain over the true Conservative running for McCain’s senate seat, but I won’t forgive or excuse her for saying she would run with RINO Mitt Romney if he decided to run in 2012. Basically Palin endorsing Fiorina doesn’t exactly give me much confidence in her.
True she is ahead of DeVore in the polls and people claim DeVore “can’t win. It reminds me of the “McClintock can’t win” chant repeated over and over again by people who voted for Schwarzenegger over McClintoock, who was the true Republican running for governor.
Now Schwarzenegger had proven to be every bit as bad as Gray Davis. If everyone who claimed “McClintock couldn’t win” had actually voted for him we would have an actual Republican as governor.
I’m voting for DeVore. If Fiorina wins, I MAY consider voting for her in the general election.
Frankly, I getting so fed up with politics in California I may stop voting for candidates altogether and only vote of the propositions.
The 17th Congressional race:
Farr(Left) v. Jeff Taylor V. Gary Richard Arnold v. Pete Andresen
Sam Farr(Farr): Who in their right mind would vote for this Marxist union stooge?
Jeff Taylor: I like Taylor and his positions, but if I remember correctly, the last time Taylor ran against Farr, he stopped campaigning and switched his voter registration to Independent. I would still vote for him if a personal friend was not running for the same seat.
Gary Richard Arnold: Arnold is a personal friend of mine and while I disagree with him on some of his 9-11 conspiracy theories, I know I agree with him on just about every other issue and I know he won’t switch parties and stop campaigning.
Pete Andresen: Don’t know much about him except that he came into the last congressional race as a write-in candidate after Taylor, for the most part abandoned the race
The main one I’m concerned about is Proposition 14 which would result in an open primary election. If this moronic proposition passes, a Demoncrat would be able to vote for a RINO in the primary so that even if their Demoncratic candidate loses in the general election they’ll get a RINO in office who will be no better than the Demoncrat.
To make it simpler, Sam Farr supporters could vote for RINO Tom Campell and if by some miracle Farr were to lose there would be another demoncrat, wearing a Republican beard in office. Near-Marxist, union stooge Sam Farr would have no problems getting the nomination even if a few Reds did vote for the RINO instead of Farr.
Not surprisingly, RINOs Arnold Schwarzenegger and Abel Maldonado support this proposition. Maldonado knows that more republicans are finally getting wise to him and it will be easier to win a primary is if Demoncrats are allowed to vote for him.
My post doesn’t cover all the candidates, propositions and issues, but I’m not really arrogant enough to believe I’ll change anyone opinions, but when this election is over and California is in the same sorry shape it’s in now, I can say I told you so.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Truancy as Political Protest
The walkout was in protest over a plan by the school district to transfer some of the teachers from Monterey schools to teach in schools in the district, whose performance isn’t up to state (?) standards. That is, if I understand the situation correctly.
Whatever their reason, students shouldn’t be able to just leave class without permission AND HOLD ME UP IN TRAFFIC (One of the unpardonable sins) without being punished!!
Days later, in the Monterey County Herald, a local left-wing rag that fancies itself a serious newspaper printed a letter from an airhead who complimented the students for their law-breaking.
In the Herald’s online comments section I wrote:
“Didn't the "walkout" make the students truants? Why were the police blocking traffic for them rather than arresting them?”
A person by the screen name of Think Again (Whom I doubt does much thinking at all) wrote:
“They were no more truants than the Mexican kids at Live Oak High School, who walked out in protest of the 5 boys wearing the American flag. They weren't arrested, either. However, the students protesting the teacher swap have far more supporters than the Mexican kids, who walked out of school.”
My response was:
“Both groups were truants, unless their absences were excused. As for the group of Mexican students who left school in protest over 5 AMERICAN students, in an AMERICAN school, who chose to wear AMERICAN FLAGS on their t-shirts, they should have also packed a few tacos and kept walking until their asses were back in Mexico.”
(More on that in a later post)
I’m sure following responses will of course, accuse me of being “racist”, but I tend to think truancy shouldn’t be encouraged, unless of course the truancy is in response to a cause I support.
Friday, April 30, 2010
This blog is now located at http://theconservativecompound.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Tea Party Folks, Beware of the LaRouche Cultists
Most people under 50 won’t know much about them. To be honest, I nearly forgot about them until I saw them at several Tea Party and local town hall events. They attended several of Congressman Sam Farr(left)’s town hall meetings holding copies of their magazine with b. hussein obama wearing a Hitler moustache. Also, at least at one of the town hall events held in Salinas, one of their members was coaching other LaRouchites when they came to the microphone to question Farr.
Obviously, B.O. is more of a Communist. However, LaRouche admires Communists and Socialists. He was at one time a member of the Trotskyite Communist Socialist Worker’s Party and a one time leader of a faction of the Students for a Democratic Society.
Years ago I read a copy of LaRouche’s publication, The New Federalist (5 Oct 98) where he called for an alliance between the United States and RED CHINA (!) in order to form a new world economic system. He also praised Red China’s economic policy. LaRouche is also a fan of FDR’s policies.
A supporter of Red China and FDR is a very bizarre, counter productive and very possibly embarrassing partner to have in the fight against an overreaching federal government.
Several good articles about Lyndon LaRouche can be found here:
I obtained other Information about LaRouche from reading his New federalist publication
Thursday, April 08, 2010
Tea Party Groups: Beware of Infiltrators
In B. Hussein Obama, the left has the perfect instrument to drag This Country down into being another Cuba or Venezuela. They will accuse anyone who opposes his leftist agenda of being “racist”. Never mind that any white president proposing the same policies would also be opposed.
When Comrade Clinton and wife tried to implement the government takeover of health “care” he was also opposed.
So, what do liberals do when they don’t have any real evidence of racism to blame on Conservatives? They try to instigate racist responses as they did when members of the Black Caucus paraded past Tea Party protesters when they were about to cast their votes for Obamacare.
One problem with the Left is that they are so deluded that they often start to believe their own propaganda.
The Congressional Reds actually believed the protesters would start screaming the “n” word at the Black Caucus members.
When, in spite of the numerous video cameras, some even held by Black Caucus members not one racial slur was recorded, they still lied and claimed racial epithets were hurled at them. One congressman even claimed initially, that one of the protesters spit on him. Of course the “spitting” wasn’t recorded on video either and the congressman backed down on his claim after being caught in his lie.
Enter the Tea Party crashers.
One left-wing website, www.trashtheteaparty.org after claiming Tea Party members are, you guessed it, “racists”, “homophobes”, “morons” etc., incites left-wing activists to show up at Tea Party protests with miss-spelled signs and make wild statements to the press. Their plan is to make the Tea Party members look like the false stereotype they themselves made up.
It was V.I Lenin who suggested such tactics in his writings, stating that party activists should try to associate their opposition with people who are already disliked by most in the general public.
The Trash the Tea Party site states their activists have already infiltrated Tea Party groups and plan to use their inside information to disrupt the protests.
On a side note, I’ve noticed liberals also like to enter Conservative discussion groups and introduce their left-wing agenda as true “Conservative” goals and claim anyone who thinks different is actually a “Neocon” (who in actuality tend to be liberal) or an “extremist”.
Make you glad these “people” respect free speech and the democratic process.
The Tea Party crashing events are planned nationwide and there is a possibility they will also try to crash the local Tea Party events.
I’m just saying beware and especially watch out for newcomers to the events.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Monterey Tea party Protest: We're BACK!!!
Monterey Tea Party Protest
I have a hunch you won’t be reading about this protest in local, Monterey County papers, but there was another Tea Party Protest at the Window-by-the-Bay in Monterey yesterday (16 January 2010).
My estimate is there were about 120-150 people attending. (Anyone who was there and has a more accurate count can correct me.)
The protest seemed to go rather smoothly for the most part. There was one brief confrontation between two of the attendees, one who was carrying a sign which said in part “Gays are afraid to debate me” and another who was apparently a sodomite and was offended by the sign. The argument was brief and I wasn’t close enough to hear much of the conversation. Eventually the apparent queer swished off back to where he came and the other gentleman disappeared to parts unknown. I never saw him for the rest of the protest. Even I would have to admit that a sign about queers is a bit out of place at a Tea Party protest which is generally meant to be a protest against big government and unconstitutional spending..
Many of the people passing by either waved or honked their horns in support of us. Of course if you were to believe Congressman Sam Farr(left) and his ilk, you would think there was little opposition to the attempted government take over of health “care”.
Speaking of Farr(left) and his ilk, I overheard one of his mindless minions at the Sand City Border's calling Republicans “know nothings” because they’re opposed to government health care (and rationing).
But then again it was Farr(left) who claimed people opposed to government health care “didn’t care” about those less fortunate. But what can one expect from the Prince of Pork and his followers.
Monday, January 04, 2010
Lunch with a Liberal (Don’t do it.)
I do have to admit, my “Spider sense” was going off a bit when we first met, as it sometimes does when I’m in the presence of liberals. I was a bit fooled by her during an earlier discussion with her when she said she was a gun owner and feared there were people (Her people I would have added had I known she was a liberal) who wanted to ban guns.
(Note: Many liberals, may nearly completely follow the liberal line, but still differ from the pack on one issue or another. That often fools some Conservatives into thinking that some liberals can be reasoned with and that we can work with them. Not so.)
Lunch began with her arriving 30-60 minutes late.
After a few pleasantries, she mentioned she was going to a local law college. I asked her if she knew one of the professors there, who I knew was a member of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), an organization recognized by a Congressional Committee as a Communist Front group. This same individual is associated with several other far-Left causes and groups.
When I mentioned this professor was a Communist she asked me with a completely straight face, “What’s wrong with Communism?” The lunch date went downhill from there. I don’t remember what my response was, but generally government ownership and/or control of businesses that should remain private is a bad thing. Their habit of stifling speech and religion probably isn’t a good idea either.
She asked how I felt about certain issues like infanticide, AKA: abortion on demand, anytime, anyplace for any reason. I of course take the view that a baby shouldn’t be killed because the mother refuses to either keep her pants on or use protection.
Of course my liberal date feels that the baby is “Leeching” off of her body and that she has the “right” to murder it because carrying it to term would be an inconvenience to her.
Like most Black liberals, she is opposed to homosexual “marriage”, but on every other issue, she’s a typical liberal.
As liberals are wont to do and especially liberals who attend law schools that have professors who associate Communist front groups, she claims the “separation of Church and state” is in the Constitution. I pointed out that phrase does not appear in the Constitution. (I should have also added it isn’t even implied in the Constitution)
She insisted that it was and told me I could look it up. Unknown to her, I keep a copy of the Constitution in my vehicle. I retrieved my copy and showed her the First Amendment, which of course say nothing about the “separation of Church and state”. Still being in the state of denial (another liberal habit) she asked me where I got my copy and I told her it may have been from an NRA meeting.
The poor airhead told me I couldn’t believe anything coming from the NRA, as if they would put out their own edited version of the Constitution. Perhaps she thinks the NRA has some liberal habits.
She also commented on my bumper stickers. She told me it was dangerous for me to have them, stating some liberal may take a shot at me or attack me in some other violent way.
Her statement confirms another reason why liberals are dangerous, because many of them think it is ok to use violence to quiet any opposition to their agenda. I had another erstwhile friend who told me my vehicle should be vandalized because the bumper stickers were “Hate speech”.
Needless to say, me and this liberal won’t be dating anytime soon, but she still had no problem leting me pay for the meal.