Whose side is George Bush Jr. on?

This post won’t make me popular with a lot of people, but the question needs to be asked. Whose side is George Bush Jr. really on? First off, given the same two choices for president I would vote for George Bush again, but if the democrats had run a candidate who wasn’t a total Marxist I would have voted for a third party candidate. No, I wouldn’t have voted for a democrat. The only presidential democratic candidate I would have voted for, Larry McDonald was shot down on flight KAL flight 007.

For the moment, I won’t speak of Bush’s increased government spending or his love affair with the UN. Right now I want to speak of his support for illegal aliens.

In December of 2004, Bush signed into law the National Intelligence Reform Act, which called for the addition of 10,000 Border Patrol agents over the next five years. 80 percent of them were to be added to the southern border. When the time came to fund the 10,000 gents, he only provided for the funding of 210.

Also in 2004, Bush called for giving amnesty to illegal aliens already in the Country. Of course, Bush and the country club Republicans don’t call it “amnesty,” he calls it giving “legal status” to “temporary workers”. On May 12^th, senators “Red” Ted Kennedy, GOP traitor John McCain and Republican-lite Jim Kolbe introduced the deceitfully-named Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act which will result in amnesty being given to illegals. Logically, when amnesty is given to illegals already in the Country, it encourages more to enter in hopes of also being granted amnesty.

Even more disgraceful, when the group known as the Minutemen made plans (and successfully carried them out) to patrol the southern border of Arizona and report illegals to the Border Patrol, rather than support them, Bush bashed them as “vigilantes”. No Mr. Bush, vigilantes would do considerably more than just report them; they would take a more active role and capture the criminals and forcibly sending their asses back across the border. They would probably also engage in a little “direct action” against the treasonous ACLU “monitors”/collaborators. Perhaps that may have to be considered if the federal government won’t do its job, but I digress.

What’s worse, there have been reports that the Border Patrol was told to not make too many arrests while the Minutemen were active as it would give them credibility.

Oddly enough, while Bush doesn’t want stop illegal aliens, on May 11^th Bush signed into law the Real ID Act, which is in effect, a national ID card. Many people who support national ID cards claim it will help control illegal immigration. As written by William Jasper of The John Birch Society, and posted on The New American magazine website, http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_1512.shtml, “Attached to the War Supplemental Spending bill, the REAL ID Act was promoted in Congress as the solution to the serious problem of illegal aliens obtaining state driver’s licenses.”

Also mentioned in the same post, Rep. Paul noted: “Proponents of the REAL ID Act continue to make the preposterous claim that the bill does not establish a national ID card. This is dangerous and insulting nonsense. Let’s get the facts straight: The REAL ID Act transforms state motor vehicle departments into agents of the federal government. Nationalizing standards for driver’s licenses and birth certificates in a federal bill creates a national ID system, pure and simple. Having the name of your particular state on the ID is meaningless window dressing.”

Again, whose side is George Bush really on?

ROBOT

Ward Churchill: When Liberals Attack

Ward Churchill, the self-described Indian spoke at the California State University Monterey Bay (CSUMB). He was invited to speak by the racist, Mexican-nationalist group MECHA. Churchill is the clown who called the 9-11 victims in the World Trade Center buildings “little Eichmanns”. As he wrote; “True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of Americas global financial empire- the `mighty engine of profit` to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved-and they did so both willingly and knowingly.” Churchill also claims to be a member of the American Indian Movement (AIM, basically Anarchists In Moccasins). It should also be noted that even that bunch of goofballs don’t claim him. The AIM Grand Governing Council, Ministry for Information issued a statement (http://www.aimovement.org/moipr/churchill05.html) condemning Churchill’s statements. They also add that Churchill fraudulently passes himself off as an Indian and a member of AIM. They report that Churchill’s AIM membership card is an honorary one that was issued by the Keetoowah Tribe of Oklahoma. The cards don’t qualify the holder as a member of any tribe. Bill Clinton was also issued an honorary membership card. (This makes him not just the “first Black president” but also the first Indian president.)

Not that his rant would be made acceptable or true even if he was really and Indian.

The local Republican Party, including CSUMB’s college Republicans organized a protest in opposition to Churchill. The protest included the reading of the names of the 9-11 victims and a candlelight vigil.

I went to the gathering to support the opposition to Churchill and see the types of degenerates who would support such a sub-human. The supporters of Churchill were the usual group of college Marxists, with a few old-time Reds thrown in for good measure. Several of the well thought out signs included “Republicans eat ****”, “How are we going to stop US sponsored terrorism?” “No war but class War” “Economic disparity (and apparently not Muslim extremism)guarantees terrorism” “America, love it or give it back” etc. Frankly, it would have been a good place for the Ohio National Guard to do some target practice.

If the anti-US, peace-preaching pukes would have stopped there, I wouldn’t have had much of a problem with them. (OK, I miss-spoke, I’d still consider them worthless savages.) But instead, they began banging drums and chanting loudly and drowning out the young women who were reading off the names. If anyone has any doubt that these savages are enemies of this Country, that act alone should convince them.

While the college Republicans and their supporters stayed outside for the candlelight vigil, I ventured inside to hear the wizened words of Churchill.

Churchill claimed to be with Colorado chapter of AIM and whined on and on for several minutes about the attempts to fire him. He also moaned about people who claim he isn’t an Indian.

Interestingly, (To me anyway) is how he credits O’Reilly and his show for giving him so much publicity. I think that it’s highly possible that this idiot would have been forgotten if O’Reilly hadn’t pumped him up. Following the usual left-wing talking points, he blames the UN sanctions (and not Saddam’s violation of them) for the deaths of Iraqi children. Ever wonder why the left’s concern for children doesn’t extend to opposing their murder by way of abortion? I don’t, I know it’s because liberals are hypocritical degenerates, but, more on that later. He also mentions Clinton’s secretary of state Madeleine (not)Albright and her condoning of the deaths of Iraqis, due to the sanctions.

He makes a bizarre cause and effect statement about wealthy people causing starving children. He whined a bit about the group of bomb-tossing crackpots known as the “Palestinians”. Now of course I know that not all “Palestinians” are terrorists, but it’s rare that you hear “Palestinians” condemning the murders of Israeli civilians.

One possibly redeeming quality of Churchill is that he opposes Kerry, claiming he sold out Vietnam vets. He claims he supports the “draft-dodger’ Bush Jr.

Churchill follows the usual leftist rants, whining about the ’54 Guatemala and Iran CIA-sponsored coups. (Both overthrew Communists, which I see as a good use of CIA resources) He sniveled about the U.S. not paying “reparations” to North Vietnam, leaving out that the reparations were agreed to under the condition that the North didn’t invade South Vietnam, which of course they did.

He snivels on about Japan trying to “surrender” (with conditions) for six months before we dropped atomic bombs on them, which led to them surrendering unconditionally. He bashes the U.S. as the only country to use atomic weapons.

He did point out actual atrocities, such as the fire-bombings of civilian targets in Japan and Germany, the slaughter of the Moros in the Philippines and the Dutch murder of the Indian population in Manhattan prior to the founding of the U.S.

You may find it hard to believe, but Churchill says he more “conservative” than the people outside protesting him. Ask him, he’ll tell you he is. He claims he’s more Conservative because he’s for following the “law”. The laws he’s speaking of are international laws that oppose the best interests of the U.S. He calls for the U.S to follow UN directives and disarm.

He denies saying that the 9-11 victims got what they deserved and claims Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson did say the victims deserved death. Churchill also claims the Right doesn’t read the Bible. Preach on Reverend Churchill.

Churchill is scum, but not unique to college university campuses. Perhaps it’s a good thing Churchill that made his hateful statements. It lets us see the enemy and how he really thinks. Churchill said what many liberals probably believe. As I said in my profile, liberals are a bigger threat to the U.S. that Al Qaida or the Soviet Union could ever be. The liberals live among us and aside from the few who wear their treasonous politics on the bumpers of their vehicles; you won’t see them until they strike.

P.S., I also recorded Churchill’s talk.

Some photos of the protests can be seen here:

http://www.picjar.com/pub/ROBOT/Ward_Churchill_at/