Sunday, January 17, 2010

Monterey Tea party Protest: We're BACK!!!



Monterey Tea Party Protest


I have a hunch you won’t be reading about this protest in local, Monterey County papers, but there was another Tea Party Protest at the Window-by-the-Bay in Monterey yesterday (16 January 2010).

My estimate is there were about 120-150 people attending. (Anyone who was there and has a more accurate count can correct me.)



The protest seemed to go rather smoothly for the most part. There was one brief confrontation between two of the attendees, one who was carrying a sign which said in part “Gays are afraid to debate me” and another who was apparently a sodomite and was offended by the sign. The argument was brief and I wasn’t close enough to hear much of the conversation. Eventually the apparent queer swished off back to where he came and the other gentleman disappeared to parts unknown. I never saw him for the rest of the protest. Even I would have to admit that a sign about queers is a bit out of place at a Tea Party protest which is generally meant to be a protest against big government and unconstitutional spending..



Many of the people passing by either waved or honked their horns in support of us. Of course if you were to believe Congressman Sam Farr(left) and his ilk, you would think there was little opposition to the attempted government take over of health “care”.

Speaking of Farr(left) and his ilk, I overheard one of his mindless minions at the Sand City Border's calling Republicans “know nothings” because they’re opposed to government health care (and rationing).

But then again it was Farr(left) who claimed people opposed to government health care “didn’t care” about those less fortunate. But what can one expect from the Prince of Pork and his followers.

Robot

Robot@mbay.net

831-869-9932

Monday, January 04, 2010

Lunch with a Liberal (Don’t do it.)

Being as I thoroughly despise liberals and barely consider most of them to be human beings, I would never knowingly date a liberal, but a mutual friend told me she was a Conservative. I don’t hold that against them, the woman (as are most liberals) was a bit deceitful.

I do have to admit, my “Spider sense” was going off a bit when we first met, as it sometimes does when I’m in the presence of liberals. I was a bit fooled by her during an earlier discussion with her when she said she was a gun owner and feared there were people (Her people I would have added had I known she was a liberal) who wanted to ban guns.

(Note: Many liberals, may nearly completely follow the liberal line, but still differ from the pack on one issue or another. That often fools some Conservatives into thinking that some liberals can be reasoned with and that we can work with them. Not so.)

Lunch began with her arriving 30-60 minutes late.

After a few pleasantries, she mentioned she was going to a local law college. I asked her if she knew one of the professors there, who I knew was a member of the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), an organization recognized by a Congressional Committee as a Communist Front group. This same individual is associated with several other far-Left causes and groups.

When I mentioned this professor was a Communist she asked me with a completely straight face, “What’s wrong with Communism?” The lunch date went downhill from there. I don’t remember what my response was, but generally government ownership and/or control of businesses that should remain private is a bad thing. Their habit of stifling speech and religion probably isn’t a good idea either.

She asked how I felt about certain issues like infanticide, AKA: abortion on demand, anytime, anyplace for any reason. I of course take the view that a baby shouldn’t be killed because the mother refuses to either keep her pants on or use protection.

Of course my liberal date feels that the baby is “Leeching” off of her body and that she has the “right” to murder it because carrying it to term would be an inconvenience to her.

Like most Black liberals, she is opposed to homosexual “marriage”, but on every other issue, she’s a typical liberal.

As liberals are wont to do and especially liberals who attend law schools that have professors who associate Communist front groups, she claims the “separation of Church and state” is in the Constitution. I pointed out that phrase does not appear in the Constitution. (I should have also added it isn’t even implied in the Constitution)

She insisted that it was and told me I could look it up. Unknown to her, I keep a copy of the Constitution in my vehicle. I retrieved my copy and showed her the First Amendment, which of course say nothing about the “separation of Church and state”. Still being in the state of denial (another liberal habit) she asked me where I got my copy and I told her it may have been from an NRA meeting.

The poor airhead told me I couldn’t believe anything coming from the NRA, as if they would put out their own edited version of the Constitution. Perhaps she thinks the NRA has some liberal habits.

She also commented on my bumper stickers. She told me it was dangerous for me to have them, stating some liberal may take a shot at me or attack me in some other violent way.

Her statement confirms another reason why liberals are dangerous, because many of them think it is ok to use violence to quiet any opposition to their agenda. I had another erstwhile friend who told me my vehicle should be vandalized because the bumper stickers were “Hate speech”.

Needless to say, me and this liberal won’t be dating anytime soon, but she still had no problem leting me pay for the meal.

Typical liberal.

Robot

Robot@mbay.net

831-869-9932